<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>Pollenizer: Building and Investing In Australian Web Startups &#187; build</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pollenizer.com/tag/build/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pollenizer.com</link> <description>Building and Investing in Australian Web Startups</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>  <item><title>Deep Customer Development is About Forming Habits</title><link>http://www.pollenizer.com/deep-customer-development-is-about-forming-habits/</link> <comments>http://www.pollenizer.com/deep-customer-development-is-about-forming-habits/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:30:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Mick Liubinskas</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[build]]></category> <category><![CDATA[community]]></category> <category><![CDATA[customer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[habits]]></category> <category><![CDATA[startup]]></category> <category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[web]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false"></guid> <description><![CDATA[Thinking about new companies finding, nurturing and winning over their first lot of customers and I realise there are a lot of similarities with forming habits. Patience &#8211; it takes time. It doesn&#8217;t happen instantly. Somethings do, like a click, or a visit or reading a tagline, but real engagement and commitment takes time. Same [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking about new companies finding, nurturing and winning over their first lot of customers and I realise there are a lot of similarities with forming habits.</p><ol><li><strong>Patience</strong> &#8211; it takes time. It doesn&#8217;t happen instantly. Somethings do, like a click, or a visit or reading a tagline, but real engagement and commitment takes time. Same with habits. For them to become a part of your life, and not just something you occasionally, intentionally do, allow plenty of time. You can&#8217;t &#8216;cram&#8217; customer development.</li><li><strong>Repetition</strong> &#8211; linked to above, but importantly different. It&#8217;s not a smooth, linear experience. Ever. The customer will always have to do a few things over and over again before they form the habit. Before it becomes normal.</li><li><strong>Unprogram</strong> &#8211; it is rare that something valuable isn&#8217;t already being fulfilled some other way. Even if it&#8217;s just a use of time, it&#8217;s still a substitute. But that&#8217;s good. It&#8217;s much much easier (though still hard) to get a customer to switch to you, than it is to get them to adopt a new thing for new value. Reality is though, that you have to get them to unlearn the old solution/habit and learn yours. That&#8217;s not easy. People call it switching cost, but it&#8217;s not a once off transaction. Inertia is against you.</li><li><strong>Distractions</strong> &#8211; habit forming doesn&#8217;t happen in a vacuum. 1,000 other things are happening at the same time. You have to be aware of the realities and work with them. Customer development is the same, it&#8217;s not a lab where you control the elements. Everyone is busy. And unless you are food, water or sex, it&#8217;s unlikely you&#8217;re going to command immediate and significant investment.</li><li><strong>Variance</strong> &#8211; &#8220;You&#8217;re unique, just like everyone else&#8221;. It&#8217;s true though, every single situation is different and here lies the focus challenge. You need to focus on a small segment and a simple value creation point but you need to allow room in there for the persons own life, needs and timing to ferment into a commitment. Habits are the same. That&#8217;s why time management tools have to be rigidly rubbery.</li><p>I&#8217;m sure there are a few more. What do you think?</p><p><img
src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pollenizerblogs/~4/GiRhOOV4VqQ" height="1" width="1"/></ol> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.pollenizer.com/deep-customer-development-is-about-forming-habits/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Market Building Dilemma</title><link>http://www.pollenizer.com/the-market-building-dilemma/</link> <comments>http://www.pollenizer.com/the-market-building-dilemma/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Mick Liubinskas</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[build]]></category> <category><![CDATA[market]]></category> <category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pollenizer.com/?p=130</guid> <description><![CDATA[Having a strong market based business is great. You are a power-broker and can often profit from both sides. But how do you get over the chicken and egg problem? Market based businesses are when you need to bring together two different parties to perform a transaction. Some examples; Ebay &#8211; needs sellers and buyers. Craigslist &#8211; [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a strong market based business is great. You are a power-broker and can often profit from both sides. But how do you get over the chicken and egg problem?</p><p>Market based businesses are when you need to bring together two different parties to perform a transaction. Some examples;</p><ul><li>Ebay &#8211; needs sellers and buyers.</li><li>Craigslist &#8211; needs advertisers and readers.</li><li>Comparison shopping &#8211; needs retailers and shoppers.</li></ul><p>This is opposed to a single customer business like products or services where you have one supplier and one customer who buys from them. Single customer businesses are often easier because you only have to convince one person/group to complete transactions.</p><p><a
title="Empty market place in Braila, sunday afternoon (by cod_gabriel)" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/8628950@N06/2397039416/"><img
title="Empty market place in Braila, sunday afternoon (by cod_gabriel)" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3216/2397039416_62fde16663_m.jpg" alt="Empty market place in Braila, sunday afternoon (by cod_gabriel)" width="240" height="180" /><br
/> Empty market place in Braila, sunday afternoon (by cod_gabriel)</a></p><p>Convincing two parties to transact is always much harder because you have to match them up at the right time with the right offer. How do you start an auction site when you don&#8217;t have any sellers to attract buyers, and you don&#8217;t have any buyers to attract sellers? How do you get over the market-building hump? There are two things you need to do.</p><h2>1. Focus (of course!)</h2><p>Instead of going after anyone and everything, going after a more targeted segment will increase your chances of a matching a transaction &#8211; i.e. a buyer wanting what a seller is offering. You only need to get 10 people selling Star Wars figurines to attract people who want to buy them. It will also make your limited resources more effective since they are focusing on a smaller segment.</p><h2>2. Buy In</h2><p>If you&#8217;ve got the budget, or the time, then you can pay for one side of the market. Often this is the seller since they are more likely to be in a list somewhere already. Finding someone willing to sell or rent a list who is non-competitve is the next challenge.</p><p>You can also heavily incentivse one side through discounts, prizes and even cash to kick things off.</p><p>Another way to buy in is by building a base of one side with some other value. This could be a blog, forum or another application which you use to grow a base and then convert it into a market. MyBlogLog did this very well, although not exactly in a market setting, by offering a stats tool for blog owners, building a base with it and then converting the base into a community. MySpace was much more of a market, and they offered Indie music bands in LA their own website and then pulled the fans in by asking the bands to promote it themselves. Clever and cheap promotion.</p><p><a
title="Arusha food market (by hansco)" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/hansco/1568864754/"><img
title="Arusha food market (by hansco)" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2418/1568864754_f4264f507d_m.jpg" alt="Arusha food market (by hansco)" width="240" height="180" /><br
/> Arusha food market (by hansco)</a></p><p>My advice is to think twice about building markets. Not to avoid it, but just to consider the chicken and egg challenge. How are you going to get over the hump? I suggest a combination of focus and buying your way in.</p><p>If you&#8217;re in a market based web business, <a
href="http://www.pollenizer.com/content/mick-liubinskas">I&#8217;d love to hear your story</a> or add a comment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.pollenizer.com/the-market-building-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
